We were contacted this week by one of our readers in response to the article “Persecution, Ontario Style”. She was offering support in light of a very similar incident which happened last year to her mother, who wishes to remain anonymous.
The reader’s mother lives in
. Thornhill is a well-to-do area just north of Thornhill, Ontario where the houses are large and well kept and the residents tend to be educated and successful. Toronto
On a hot summer day in July, 2006, out of the blue, the doorbell rang.
The 64-year-old woman opened the door to find an Animal Control Officer (ACO) standing there. As it was such a hot day, she invited the officer into the house where it was cooler. He asked if he could see her dog. The woman obliged, assuming they were following up on the licensing program in Thornhill.
“Lucky”, a five-year-old Labrador Retriever, was licensed with the city. The woman went into the backyard and brought Lucky, who was wearing her collar and licence tag, into the house to meet the ACO.
The officer began to take many pictures of Lucky. He didn't ask Lucky's breed, age or anything else about her.
After he had taken the photos, he pulled out some papers which explained DOLA (Dog Owners Liability Act) and the amendments which ban American Pit Bull Terriers, Staffordshire Bull Terriers, American Staffordshire Terriers and any dogs which are substantially similar to those breeds.
He then informed the woman that he was taking Lucky with him to be destroyed.
The shocked and horrified dog owner didn’t understand what was happening. She started to cry for fear of what would happen to her dog. To have an ACO arrive at your house unexpectedly and to invite them in on a hot day and then hear them say that they are taking your dog for destruction is almost incomprehensible.
At this point, the woman’s husband came into the room. He promptly escorted the officer off the property and told him not to come back unless he had a warrant and court order for the destruction of their dog.
One month later, two police officers showed up at this couple’s door and charged them under DOLA with owning a prohibited dog.
Lucky is a five-year-old black, purebred, registered Labrador Retriever.
The couple took the registration papers to their set court date which proved their dog is not banned in the
. The charges were dismissed. province of Ontario
Imagine what would have happened had Lucky not been a registered purebred dog. How many dogs in the province are unregistered? How many are mixed breed dogs that CANNOT be registered? There is NO proof of your dog’s breed without registration papers. The Canadian Kennel Club estimates that only 10% of
dogs are purebred and registered. That means that 90% of all dogs in Ontario cannot have their lineage proved. That means that 90% of all dogs in Ontario , when found in this situation could lose their lives if they are not Lucky! Ontario
The couple feel this whole situation may have started over a neighbour dispute over how to cut the hedge bordering on both properties. They have no proof because Animal Control won't release the names of complainants, but can’t think of any other reason why that ACO came knocking on their door on that nightmarish day.
Between the time of the visit and subsequent charges being laid and the court appearance the woman had a heart attack and was diagnosed with stomach ulcers. Her doctor attributed both to stress!
We hope she is well on her way to recovery!
It is sickening to think about what this Ontario Liberal Government has done to responsible citizens of this province!
It is now a crime to own somebody's idea of the wrong shape of dog in
It makes us very angry to know that responsible dog owners in the Province of Ontario were legislated into SECOND CLASS STATUS AND HAD THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS STRIPPED BECAUSE OF GRANDSTANDING AND GOVERNMENT IRRESPONSIBILITY!!
Lucky is a shorter than standard, stocky pet dog. In the words of the owner “she still looks like a Lab, just a fat one!”
Lucky was named as such because the woman felt she was “lucky” her husband agreed to let her get a dog..
I would like to say this is unbelievable, but there are more and more stories emerging just like this. And yet the insanity persists. The same lies, the same disproved statis, the same paranoic ramblings of vote-seeking idiots continue to circulate. My heart aches for these people - and it is becoming increasingly clear that innocent dogs (and owners) are being increasingly targetted through their dogs for neighbourhood disputes - it would be interesting to trace exclty how many are related to over-zealous (and nasty) animal control officers and how many to bad relationships.ReplyDelete
I am so sorry to hear of this poor couple's distressing experience, but sadly we now live in a fascist province, one that is run more like a police state. And the terrifying thing is that those overzealous officers that are hired to enforce these outrageous laws, are themselves so ignorant, which makes it all so much more frightening. I have a purebred golden retriever, that was a rescue, without pedigree papers, and I don't feel she is now safe walking in the city I live in. I've heard of illegal break and enter seizures while the owners were away from their homes, and have had to resort to police assistance to get their dogs back, and their dog was a purebred black lab, with papers, vet certification and micro chip. I'm not sure what the answer is, except to keep making noise and protesting to have this horrendous BSL law repealed. And to do that we have to make a lot of noise, sign petitions, cluster publicly en masse as often as is necessary, or the next dog could be yours and might not be so Lucky!ReplyDelete
Such a horrible story but...with a happy ending at least for Lucky ! I have a brindle dog too only she's a greyhound. Not everyone who has a Greyhound has their papers but really, how could you mistake a Greyhound for one of these poor unfortunate dogs listed in Ontario's teerible legislation on "pit bulls."ReplyDelete
This comment has been removed by the author.ReplyDelete
Never be surprised for what can be mistaken for a "pitbull". There is no such breed as a "pitbull" therefore any dog an AC officer or any peace officer deems a "pitbull" leaves it up to the owner to prove it is not, which is impossible if the dog is not a registered pure bred! It would absolutely make your hair curl to see the dogs that have been labeled a "pitbull' and in turn killed or shipped. Thousands of dogs have been killed based on identification. There are no requirements to know anything about dogs in order to become an AC officer. Police have NO training unless they are in the canine unit and even then it isn't training in identifying dogs by breed. No one is qualified to identify cross bred dogs by breed and under reverse onus it is a lose lose situation for the dog owner! Council for the AG's office stated in court; "If it's brindle, its a pitbull, if its black and tan its a Rottweiller".ReplyDelete